What "unlimited requests" should mean, precisely
Unlimited should be a testable claim, not a mood. If a plan has a real ceiling anywhere, that number belongs on the pricing page, not the word unlimited.
Opinion on the location data business: pricing, lock-in, privacy, and what the big providers get wrong.
Unlimited should be a testable claim, not a mood. If a plan has a real ceiling anywhere, that number belongs on the pricing page, not the word unlimited.
Charging more to look up an address in one country than another treats geography itself as a pricing lever instead of plain, ordinary data to serve.
A postal code endpoint priced and documented like an afterthought will get built like one too. Treating it seriously starts with treating it equally.
Most time zone bugs do not come from bad data. They come from code that was never tested against the one week a year when the rules actually change.
An IP lookup API that still treats IPv6 as a minor edge case is quietly treating a growing share of real internet traffic as an afterthought.
A geocoding API that gates real testing behind a sales conversation is asking a developer for trust before it has actually earned any of it.
A free tier that gets cut without warning does not just cost the provider goodwill. It breaks whatever the customer built on top of an assumption that was never guaranteed.
A customer who signs up not understanding a limit is a customer who leaves angry later. Telling them up front costs a sale sometimes. It is still the better trade.
Enterprise-grade often just means the real price and the real usage limits are hidden behind a private sales call instead of a public pricing page.
An account-level quota tracks who you are. A network-level quota tracks where your traffic actually comes from. A serious system needs both.
Only Our takes, as it is published.
Subscribe to Our takes